Intravitreal Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Choroidal Neovascularization in Best’s Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To evaluate the results of intravitreal ranibizumab injection in a case with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in Best’s vitelliform macular dystrophy with different imaging modalities. A 20-year-old male with the complaint of reduced vision in the right eye underwent complete ophthalmological examination including fluorescein angiography (FA), fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging. Macular scans were obtained with spectral optical coherence tomography (OCT). Best corrected visual acuity was counting fingers at 2 meters in the right eye. Fluorescein angiography and OCT confirmed the diagnosis of CNV associated with Best’s vitelliform macular dystrophy. After 3 monthly injections of intravitreal ranibizumab, CNV regressed and macular edema disappeared. Visual acuity improved to 10 / 10. His condition remained stable for 3 years after treatment. We concluded that the intrav itreal ranibizumab may be a new approach for the therapy of CNV in Best’s vitelliform macular dystrophy. However, a long-term follow-up is warranted. Different imaging modalities help us to understand the different aspects of macular involvement in this disease complicated with CNV. doi:10.4021/jmc619w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".