Using 2-Aminopurine Fluorescence To Detect Base Unstacking in the Template Strand during Nucleotide Incorporation by the Bacteriophage T4 DNA Polymerase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fluorescence of the base analogue 2-aminopurine (2AP) was used to detect physical changes in the template strand during nucleotide incorporation by the bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. Fluorescent enzyme-DNA complexes were formed with 2AP placed in the template strand opposite the primer terminus (the n position) and placed one template position 5' to the primer terminus (the n + 1 position). The fluorescence enhancement for 2AP at the n position was shown to be due to formation of the editing complex, which indicates that the 2AP-T terminal base pair is recognized primarily as a mismatch. 2AP fluorescence at the n + 1 position, however, was a reporter for DNA interactions in the polymerase active center that induce intrastrand base unstacking. T4 DNA polymerase produced base unstacking at the n + 1 position following formation of the phosphodiester bond. Thus, the increase in fluorescence intensity for 2AP at the n + 1 position could be used to measure the nucleotide incorporation rate in primer extension reactions in which 2AP was placed initially at the n + 2 position. Primer extension occurred at the rate of about 314 s(-1). The amount of base unstacking at the template n + 1 position was sensitive to the local DNA sequence. More base unstacking was detected for DNA substrates with an A-T base pair at the primer terminus compared to C-G or G-C base pairs. Since proofreading is also increased by A-T base pairs compared to G-C base pairs at the primer terminus, we propose that base unstacking may provide an opportunity for the DNA polymerase to reexamine the primer terminus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".