Impact d'un programme multi-stratégique de groupe sur le fonctionnement dans les activités de la vie domestique de personnes âgées présentant des déficits cognitifs légers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the impact of a group activity program on the level of functioning of a person in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). This program was specifically designed for people with mild cognitive deficiencies living at home and attending a day centre. METHOD: Using a single subject design of AB type, eleven persons were assigned randomly to a experimental group (n = 7) and to a control group (n = 4). Their cognitive functioning was found to be between the 5th and the 25th percentile on the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS), which corresponds to stage 3 on the Reisberg Scale. The 18 week long multi-strategic program consisted of two weekly meetings of one and a half hours each. This program included physical exercises, psychomusical techniques, cognitive games and tasks related to IADL. The level of functioning of the subjects in their IADL was measured six times at home using the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS), before, during and after the program. FINDINGS: The data derived from each subject were presented as a graphical analysis. Following the application of the program, more of the participants, as compared to the control subjects, improved their functioning in terms of IADL. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that it would be possible to use coping strategies in the early stages of cognitive deficits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".