MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079543056 · doi:10.3109/15513815.2014.999391

Fatty Infiltration of the Thymus in Response to Illness in the Pediatric Population

2015· article· en· W2079543056 on OpenAlexaff
Mana Taweevisit, Tauangtham Anekpuritanang, Paul S. Thorner

Bibliographic record

VenueFetal and Pediatric Pathology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids FoundationUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfiltration (HVAC)Involution (esoterism)MedicineFetusThymic involutionChorioamnionitisGlucocorticoidPregnancyPhysiologyAdipose tissueGestational agePopulationPathologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyImmune systemImmunologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under physiologic stress, glucocorticoids contribute to thymic involution. While steroids enhance fatty infiltration, this change has not been well studied in the pediatric thymus during illness. Evaluation of 130 thymuses from fetuses, infants and children determined the frequency of thymic fatty infiltration to be low (25%), particularly in fetal thymus (4%). In most cases, fatty infiltration was focal. There was a significant correlation with duration of illness, but not with patient age, gestational age, or underlying disease. There was significantly less fatty infiltration in fetal thymus compared to post-natal thymus, for the same degree of thymic involution. Only seven cases showed diffuse thymic fatty infiltration; all were post-natal associated with an infectious etiology. In contrast, fetal cases of chorioamnionitis seldom showed fatty infiltration and only focally, implying the stress response of fetal thymus differs post-natal, possibly related to the timing of adipose tissue development and fetal glucocorticoid response to stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFetal and Pediatric PathologySame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207