Macromolecule and water magnetization exchange modeling in articular cartilage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Magnetization exchange effects between the matrix macromolecules (e. g., collagen and proteoglycan) and water were examined in normal, deuterated, and proteoglycan-depleted articular cartilage. Relaxation results (T(2), T(1rho), and T(1)) suggested that a four-site exchange scheme provided an accurate model for articular cartilage relaxation and interspin group coupling details. Magnetization exchange within the collagen-bulk-water, proteoglycan-collagen, and collagen fibrillar water-collagen cartilage subsystems were quantified. Although collagen-bulk-water was the largest of the cartilage coupling subsystems ( approximately 90% signal) and is exploited in MRI, the rates of magnetization transfer (MT) within the latter subsystems were appreciably larger. Magnetization exchange rates for proteoglycan-collagen and collagen fibrillar water-collagen were 120 s(-1) and 4.4 s(-1), respectively. The observation of these latter two exchange subsystems suggested potential clinical MRI-MT applications in detecting molecular abnormalities associated with osteoarthritis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".