Synthesis and degradation of dinoflagellate plastid-encoded psbA proteins are light-regulated, not circadian-regulated
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In many dinoflagellate species, the plastid genome has been proposed to exist as a limited number of single-gene minicircles, and many genes normally found in the plastid genome are nuclear-encoded. Unlike the nuclear-encoded plastid-directed gene products whose expression is often regulated by the circadian clock, little is known about expression of minicircle genes. Furthermore, even the plastid location of the minicircles has recently been challenged. We have examined the incorporation in vivo of [(35)S]methionine into the proteins of purified plastids, and we find that several plastid proteins are labeled in the presence of cycloheximide but not chloramphenicol. One of these proteins, labeled in two different dinoflagellate species, was identified as psbA by Western blot analysis. Furthermore, this psbA has the expected physiological characteristics, because both synthesis and degradation are induced by light. We find no evidence for circadian control over either synthesis or degradation of psbA, unlike the several nuclear-encoded plastid-directed proteins studied. Finally, we find that levels of psbA protein or RNA do not change over a 24-h light-dark cycle, suggesting that this protein may not be involved in mediating the circadian rhythm in oxygen evolution rates. This demonstration is the first, to our knowledge, that minicircle genes encoding plastid proteins are translated in dinoflagellate plastids, and it suggests that a proteomic approach to characterizing the dinoflagellate plastid genome is feasible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".