MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079599029 · doi:10.4161/isl.1.3.9678

Control of secretory granule access to the plasma membrane by PI3 kinase-γ

2009· article· en· W2079599029 on OpenAlexafffund
Patrick E. MacDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueIslets · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanada Research ChairsCanadian Diabetes Association
KeywordsExocytosisCell biologySecretionRegulatorKinaseBiologyPhosphatidylinositolInsulinSignal transductionProtein kinase AInsulin receptorGene isoformProtein kinase CEndocrinologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role and mechanism of phosphatidylinositol 3-OH (PI3) kinase as a regulator of insulin secretion is much debated. Studies employing non-selective pharmacological agents suggest a negative role for this key signal transduction enzyme in insulin release, perhaps through regulation of ATP-sensitive K (+) channels. There are however, three PI3 kinase families containing several kinase isoforms. More recent studies, including our own recently published work, have begun to investigate PI3 kinase isoform-specific mechanisms regulating insulin secretion. Building on our previous work demonstrating that mice lacking a G-protein coupled PI3 kinase catalytic subunit (p110γ -/-) lack first phase insulin secretion and display a blunted second phase of secretion, we have now elucidated the mechanism by which this PI3 kinase isoform acts as a positive regulator of insulin secretion. Using a combined molecular and pharmacological approach, together with biophysical assays of insulin exocytosis and cellular imaging, we demonstrated that p110γ is an important modulator of insulin granule exocytosis and localization to the plasma membrane by modulating cortical actin density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIsletsSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207