Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article describes an efficiency study of directional bremsstrahlung splitting (DBS) for x-ray tube modeling. DBS is shown to be up to five or six orders of magnitude more efficient at 50 or 135 kV tube potential than a simulation without splitting, and 60 times more efficient compared to uniform bremsstrahlung splitting. A methodology is presented to determine the optimum splitting number for a given situation using a second degree polynomial expression derived from theoretical considerations. Very large optimum splitting numbers are found for small fields (5 mm radius) at 1 m from the x-ray source, which are relevant for half-value layer (HVL) calculations and for simulations related to primary air kerma standards. Two approaches for the calculation of kerma at a plane and inside a volume using track-length estimation are implemented in BEAMnrc, a user-code from the EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulation system for photon and electron transport. A practical application of DBS to HVL calculations for a Comet MXR-320 x-ray tube is reported. The agreement with measured HVLs at different constant tube potentials is found to be better than 2.3%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".