MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PD03-06: Clinical and Biologic Effects of Metformin in Early Stage Breast Cancer

2010· article· en· W2079631262 on OpenAlexaff
Saroj Niraula, Vuk Stambolic, RJO Dowling, Marguerite Ennis, MC Chang, SJ Done, S Hallak, Nicky Hood, Wey L. Leong, JM Escallon, PJ Goodwin

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkMount Sinai HospitalOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetforminMedicineBreast cancerInternal medicineAMPKCancerInterim analysisProtein kinase BEndocrinologyOncologyInsulinApoptosisKinaseClinical trialProtein kinase ABiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Numerous epidemiological and pre-clinical studies have associated potential antineoplastic activity with the antidiabetic drug metformin in various tumor types including breast cancer (BC). We are conducting a neoadjuvant “window of opportunity” study to examine biologic and clinical effects of metformin in early stage BC. Data from a planned interim analysis are presented here. Materials and methods: 15 of planned 40 non-diabetic women < 75 yo with newly diagnosed untreated BC were given metformin 500 mg tid for ≥2 weeks post diagnostic core biopsy until definitive surgery. Fasting blood and tumor tissue were obtained, anthropometric measurements performed and the EORTC QLQ C-30 administered pre-metformin and on the day of surgery. Clinical (weight, symptoms, EORTC QLQ C-30) and biologic characteristics were compared pre-metformin and at the end of metformin treatment as were Ki67 (our primary end-point), terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL), cleaved caspase 3, physiologic markers (insulin, HOMA,TNF-alpha) and molecular markers [phosphorylated 4E-BP1, phosphorylated protein kinase B (P-PKB/Akt), phosphorylated AMPK (P-AMPK), insulin receptor(IR), Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor(IGF-1R)]. Analysis of Ki67, cleaved Caspase 3 and TUNNEL were performed on a blinded fashion. Ki-67 was scored by manual count selected by and expressed as percentage of cells with positive nuclear staining. Results: Mean age was 51.7 years. 73.3% (11/15) and 26.7% (4/15) had T1 and T2 BC respectively; 40% (6/15) were node positive, 86.7% (13/15) were ER and PR positive and 26.6% (4/15) were HER-2 +. Metformin was administered for a median of 21 days (range 14 - 40). Gastrointestinal (GI) side effects were most frequent and usually self-limiting — mild diarrhoea 60% (9/15), anorexia 53% (8/15) and nausea 46% (7/15). EORTC30 QLQ scores were stable. Weight decreased (mean change -0.81 kg; Mann-Whitney U p-value 0.057). HOMA (a marker of insulin sensitivity) and C-reactive protein improved, mean change -0.32 and -0.21mg/L respectively. Ki67 decreased significantly after metformin treatment (from 27.6 to 22.7, Wilcoxon signed-rank test p-value = 0.043); TUNEL staining increased significantly (from 0.43 to 1.48, p=0.03) and cleaved Caspase 3 increased non-significantly (from 1.01 to 3.96, p=0.31). Conclusion: Preoperative metformin was well tolerated with mild GI toxicities, but no significant QOL effects; it was associated with improved insulin resistance. A short term administration of metformin significantly reduced breast cancer cell proliferation (as measured by change in Ki67 index) and induced apoptosis (reflected by TUNEL). Metformin administration elicited potential physiologic and cellular effects in breast cancer that are in keeping with beneficial anti-cancer effects. Updated results and the impact of metformin on IR/IGF1R/PI3K and AMPK/mTOR signaling pathways within the cancers will be reported. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD03-06.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicMetabolism, Diabetes, and CancerFrench-language works237,207