MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079711663 · doi:10.1159/000047846

Morphology of the Laminar Junction in Relation to the Shape of the Hoof Capsule and Distal Phalanx in Adult Horses <i>(Equus caballus)</i>

2001· article· en· W2079711663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCells Tissues Organs · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Equine Medical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsHoofAnatomyLaminar flowCircumferenceLaminitisPhalanxEquusClawMaterials scienceBiologyGeometryHorseMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose was to investigate whether differences in equine hoof shape, which are inferred to alter foot function, are accompanied by differences in morphology of the laminar junction. Ten fore feet from adult horses were segregated into normal and low-angle groups, depending on the dorsal angle of the hoof wall. Twenty measurements of external hoof shape and four of the enclosed distal phalanx were tested for differences between groups, and for intragroup correlations. Three measurements of laminar morphology (spacing, orientation and degree of bend) were recorded for samples of up to 50 primary epidermal laminae at each of 20 sample sites. Sites were distributed over the foot in 5 circumferential columns and 4 proximodistal rows. Intergroup differences were investigated, as were correlations among sample sites of the laminar variables with the shape measurements. Results show differences in hoof shape between groups (but not bone shape) and laminar morphology. Six shape measurements are significantly different between groups: dorsal angle, medial and lateral angles, lateral sole width, solar circumference, and dorsal length. In the normal group, shape measurements show patterns of correlation among regions of the hoof, and between hoof and bone measurements. In the low-angle group, shape correlations occur largely within one region of the hoof (the heels) and in the bone measurements. Laminar spacing tends to be nonsignificantly greater in the low-angle group, while variances for laminar spacing and orientation are significantly greater in this group. Laminar spacing correlates with bone width and coronary circumference (CC) of the hoof in the normal group, but only with CC in the low-angle group. When taken as a whole, and interpreted in light of a model of foot mechanical function, the results appear to indicate a deterioration in structural coherence of the foot in the low-angle group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it