Genetic and morphological analysis of floral homeotic mutants<i>tepal-like bract</i>and<i>fagopyrum apetala</i>of<i>Fagopyrum esculentum</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The studies on floral homeotic mutants of the model plant species Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. and Antirrhinum majus L. have clarified many important aspects of the genetic control of flower development. However, the details of this process can vary in species representing different lineages of flowering plants. The studies on floral homeotic mutants of nonmodel plant species may significantly improve the understanding of the mechanisms of morphological evolution of flowers. We report here the results of the genetic and morphological analysis of two floral homeotic mutants of common buckwheat ( Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.). The mutant, tepal-like bract (tlb), is characterized by the transformation of bracts into petaloid organs, whereas fagopyrum apetala (fap), has a carpelloid perianth. Both mutant phenotypes are caused by a single recessive nuclear mutation. The double mutant fap tlb combines the features of tlb and fap. Our results show that single gene mutations are sufficient to convert the buckwheat bract into a tepal and to confer carpel identity on first whorl organs. These results are consistent with the premise that variations on the ABC model can be used to explain a wide range of floral architectures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".