MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079752406 · doi:10.1074/mcp.m900222-mcp200

Interlaboratory Study Characterizing a Yeast Performance Standard for Benchmarking LC-MS Platform Performance

2009· article· en· W2079752406 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Amanda G. Paulovich, Dean Billheimer, Amy‐Joan L. Ham, Lorenzo Vega‐Montoto, Paul A. Rudnick, David L. Tabb, Pei Wang, Ronald K. Blackman, David M. Bunk, Helene L. Cardasis, Karl R. Clauser, Christopher R. Kinsinger, Birgit Schilling, Tony Tegeler, Asokan Mulayath Variyath, Mu Wang, Jeffrey R. Whiteaker, Lisa J. Zimmerman, David Fenyö, Steven A. Carr, Susan J. Fisher, Bradford W. Gibson, Mehdi Mesri, Thomas A. Neubert, Fred E. Regnier, Henry Rodriguez, Cliff Spiegelman, Stephen E. Stein, Paul Tempst, D.C. Liebler

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular & Cellular Proteomics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillBroad InstituteMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterIndiana University-Purdue University IndianapolisLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of ArizonaNational Institute of General Medical SciencesMassachusetts General HospitalBuck Institute for Research on AgingPurdue UniversityUniversity of Washington
KeywordsBenchmarkingChromatographyChemistryComputer scienceComputational biologyBiologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optimal performance of LC-MS/MS platforms is critical to generating high quality proteomics data. Although individual laboratories have developed quality control samples, there is no widely available performance standard of biological complexity (and associated reference data sets) for benchmarking of platform performance for analysis of complex biological proteomes across different laboratories in the community. Individual preparations of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteome have been used extensively by laboratories in the proteomics community to characterize LC-MS platform performance. The yeast proteome is uniquely attractive as a performance standard because it is the most extensively characterized complex biological proteome and the only one associated with several large scale studies estimating the abundance of all detectable proteins. In this study, we describe a standard operating protocol for large scale production of the yeast performance standard and offer aliquots to the community through the National Institute of Standards and Technology where the yeast proteome is under development as a certified reference material to meet the long term needs of the community. Using a series of metrics that characterize LC-MS performance, we provide a reference data set demonstrating typical performance of commonly used ion trap instrument platforms in expert laboratories; the results provide a basis for laboratories to benchmark their own performance, to improve upon current methods, and to evaluate new technologies. Additionally, we demonstrate how the yeast reference, spiked with human proteins, can be used to benchmark the power of proteomics platforms for detection of differentially expressed proteins at different levels of concentration in a complex matrix, thereby providing a metric to evaluate and minimize pre-analytical and analytical variation in comparative proteomics experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.074
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.080
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0740.080
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations170
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular & Cellular ProteomicsSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207