MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079778211 · doi:10.1248/cpb.56.374

Endodesmiadiol, a Friedelane Triterpenoid, and Other Antiplasmodial Compounds from Endodesmia calophylloides

2008· article· en· W2079778211 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Erasmienne Tambou Ngouamegne, René Soh Fongang, Silvère Augustin Ngouela, Fabrice Fekam Boyom, Michel Rohmer, Etienne Tsamo, Jiří Gut, Philip J. Rosenthal

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNatural product bioactivities and synthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut Universitaire de FranceAgence Universitaire de la Francophonie
KeywordsFriedelinChemistryPlasmodium falciparumStereochemistryTriterpenoidChloroquineIC50Traditional medicineTerpeneTerpenoidEthyl acetatePharmacognosyBiological activityIn vitroOrganic chemistryBiochemistryMalaria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From the ethyl acetate extract of the stem bark of Endodesmia calophylloides (Guttiferae), a novel friedelane triterpenoid named endodesmiadiol (1), as well as the known compounds friedelin (2), canophyllol (3), canophyllal (4), cerin (5), morelloflavone (6), volkensiflavone (7), 8-deoxygartanin (8), 3 beta-acetoxyoleanolic acid (9) and 1,8-dihydroxy-3-isoprenyloxy-6-methylxanthone (10) have been isolated. The structures of these compounds were established by spectroscopic analysis, and the relative configuration of endodesmiadiol (1) was confirmed by X-ray diffraction. The antiplasmodial activity of the isolated compounds was evaluated against the W2 strain of Plasmodium falciparum which is resistant to chloroquine and other antimalarial drugs. All the compounds were found to be active with IC50 values ranging from 7.2 to 23.6 microM. The IC50 of endodesmiadiol was found to be 11.8 microM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical and Pharmaceutical BulletinSame topicNatural product bioactivities and synthesisFrench-language works237,207