Stress-Induced Alterations in Coagulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: For the examination of psychological stress effects on coagulation, the Dill and Costill correction (DCC) for hemoconcentration effects has been used to adjust for stress-induced plasma volume changes. Although the correction is appropriate for adjusting concentrations of various large blood constituents, it may be inappropriate for time-dependent or functional coagulation assays. Two new plasma reconstitution techniques for correcting hemoconcentration effects on stress-induced changes in coagulation were compared with the DCC. METHODS: Blood was collected from 31 men during baseline, the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), and after 20-minute recovery. For the reconstitution techniques, TSST plasma samples were reconstituted with either baseline plasma or physiological saline equal to the amount of plasma lost during stress. RESULTS: Uncorrected activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) decreased, whereas fibrinogen, factor VIII clotting activity (FVIII:C), D-dimer and prothrombin time (PT%) increased significantly during the TSST. The DCC produced a significantly greater decrease in APTT during stress compared to uncorrected APTT, a significant decrease in PT% compared to uncorrected PT%, and stress D-dimer and fibrinogen and FVIII:C being no different than baseline. APTT, fibrinogen, D-dimer and PT% after saline reconstitution were not different from baseline, whereas FVIII:C after saline reconstitution remained elevated. APTT, PT%, fibrinogen and D-dimer after plasma reconstitution were no different from uncorrected values, whereas FVIII:C remained significantly elevated. CONCLUSIONS: The observed changes in coagulation are likely in part a consequence of stress and hemoconcentration, but the DCC seems to be an inappropriate hemoconcentration correction technique of time-dependent assays. The saline reconstitution technique may be more biologically relevant when examining stress-hemoconcentration effects on coagulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".