Abnormal in vivo myocardial energy substrate uptake in diet-induced type 2 diabetic cardiomyopathy in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine in vivo myocardial energy metabolism and function in a nutritional model of type 2 diabetes. Wistar rats rendered insulin-resistant and mildly hyperglycemic, hyperinsulinemic, and hypertriglyceridemic with a high-fructose/high-fat diet over a 6-wk period with injection of a small dose of streptozotocin (HFHFS) and control rats were studied using micro-PET (microPET) without or with a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. During glucose clamp, myocardial metabolic rate of glucose measured with [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) was reduced by approximately 81% (P < 0.05), whereas myocardial plasma nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) uptake as determined by [(18)F]fluorothia-6-heptadecanoic acid ([(18)F]FTHA) was not significantly changed in HFHFS vs. control rats. Myocardial oxidative metabolism as assessed by [(11)C]acetate and myocardial perfusion index as assessed by [(13)N]ammonia were similar in both groups, whereas left ventricular ejection fraction as assessed by microPET was reduced by 26% in HFHFS rats (P < 0.05). Without glucose clamp, NEFA uptake was approximately 40% lower in HFHFS rats (P < 0.05). However, myocardial uptake of [(18)F]FTHA administered by gastric gavage was significantly higher in HFHFS rats (P < 0.05). These abnormalities were associated with reduced Glut4 mRNA expression and increased Cd36 mRNA expression and mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 activity (P < 0.05). HFHFS rats display type 2 diabetes complicated by left ventricular contractile dysfunction with profound reduction in myocardial glucose utilization, activation of fatty acid metabolic pathways, and preserved myocardial oxidative metabolism, suggesting reduced myocardial metabolic efficiency. In this model, increased myocardial fatty acid exposure likely occurs from circulating triglyceride, but not from circulating plasma NEFA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".