The Region between Transmembrane Domains 1 and 2 of the Reduced Folate Carrier Forms Part of the Substrate-binding Pocket
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A functional cysteine-less form of the hamster reduced folate carrier protein was generated by alanine replacement of the 14 cysteine residues. The predicted 12-transmembrane topology was examined by replacing selected amino acids, predicted to be exposed to the extracellular or cytosolic environments, with cysteines. The location of these cysteines was defined by their accessibility to biotin maleimide in the presence or absence of specific blocking agents. Amino acids predicted to be exposed to the extracellular environment (S46C, S179C, L300C, Y355C, and K430C) could be labeled with biotin maleimide; this modification could be blocked by prior treatment with nonpermeable reagents. Amino acids predicted to be within the cytosol (S152C, Cys224, and L475C) could be labeled only after streptolysin O permeabilization. In addition, the cysteine-less reduced folate carrier was exploited to evaluate a potential substrate-binding domain as suggested by previous studies. Nineteen cysteine replacements were generated between residues 39 and 75, a region located between the first and second transmembrane segments. From the biotinylation of these sites and the ability of various reagents to block this labeling, it appears that L41C, E45C, S46C, T49C, I66C, and L70C are exposed to the extracellular environment, whereas Q54C, Q61C, and T63C are slightly less accessible. Cysteines 39, 42, 44, 47, 51, and 73 were inefficiently biotinylated, suggesting that these sites are located in the membrane or within a tightly folded domain of the protein. Furthermore, biotinylation of cysteines 41, 46, 49, 70, and 71 could be prevented by prior treatment with either methotrexate or folinic acid, indicating that these sites form part of a substrate-binding pocket.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".