MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Proteomic analysis of the bacteriocin thuricin 17 produced by<i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i>NEB17

2005· article· en· W2079912143 on OpenAlexafffund
Elizabeth J. Gray, Marcos Rafael Di Falco, Alfred Souleimanov, Donald L. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueFEMS Microbiology Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProbiotics and Fermented Foods
Canadian institutionsMcGill Genome CentreMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBacteriocinBacillus thuringiensisEdman degradationMass spectrometryBiologyChemistryMicrobiologyLantibioticsBacillalesBiochemistryPeptide sequenceChromatographyBacteriaAntimicrobialGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thuricin 17 is a recently discovered bacteriocin produced by Bacillus thuringiensis NEB17. The objective of this work was to conduct a proteomic analysis of this bacteriocin. The partial N- and C-terminal amino-acid sequences of thuricin 17 have now been determined using the Edman degradation and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-quadrapole time of flight mass spectrometry (MS)/MS. A hydrophobic cluster analysis indicates that thuricin 17 contains a hydrophobic region, potentially corresponding to a membrane associated domain. Based on time of production, this bacteriocin may be produced as a secondary metabolite. Interestingly, thuricin 17 shares the same N-terminal sequence, DWTXWSXL, with a previously reported bacteriocin, Bacthuricin F4, produced by B. thuringiensis ssp. kurstaki strain BUPM4. This is the first time two bacteriocins from different Bacillus species have been shown to share similar N-terminal sequences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEMS Microbiology LettersSame topicProbiotics and Fermented FoodsFrench-language works237,207