Cortical porosity is higher in boys compared with girls at the distal radius and distal tibia during pubertal growth: An HR-pQCT study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the sex- and maturity-related differences in bone microstructure and estimated bone strength at the distal radius and distal tibia in children and adolescents. We used high-resolution pQCT to measure standard morphological parameters in addition to cortical porosity (Ct.Po) and estimated bone strength by finite element analysis. Participants ranged in age from 9 to 22 years (n = 212 girls and n = 186 boys) who were scanned annually for either one (11%) or two (89%) years at the radius and for one (15%), two (39%), or three (46%) years at the tibia. Participants were grouped by the method of Tanner into prepubertal, early pubertal, peripubertal, and postpubertal groups. At the radius, peri- and postpubertal girls had higher cortical density (Ct.BMD; 9.4% and 7.4%, respectively) and lower Ct.Po (-118% and -56%, respectively) compared with peri- and postpubertal boys (all p < 0.001). Peri- and postpubertal boys had higher trabecular bone volume ratios (p < 0.001) and larger cortical cross-sectional areas (p < 0.05, p < 0.001) when compared with girls. Based upon the load-to-strength ratio (failure load/estimated fall force), boys had lower risk of fracture than girls at every stage except during early puberty. Trends at the tibia were similar to the radius with differences between boys and girls in Ct.Po (p < 0.01) and failure load (p < 0.01) at early puberty. Across pubertal groups, within sex, the most mature girls and boys had higher Ct.BMD and lower Ct.Po than their less mature peers (prepuberty) at both the radius and tibia. Girls in early, peri-, and postpubertal groups and boys in peri- and postpubertal groups had higher estimates of bone strength compared with their same-sex prepubertal peers (p < 0.001). These results provide insight into the sex- and maturity-related differences in bone microstructure and estimated bone strength.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".