Redox-active metals in commercial preparations of lipopolysaccharide: implications for studies of cellular responses to bacterial products
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanisms by which lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activates cells have been the subject of intense investigation for many years. Whereas much information on this process has been collected for mammalian species, little is known about the signalling path-ways operative in other animals. One general mode of cellular activation that has been recently pro-posed for pathways independent of the primary mammalian LPS receptor, CD14, involves reactive oxygen species (ROS) as intermediates in LPS-induced signalling pathways. Therefore, we used 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein, a fluorogenic probe of redox activity, to examine LPS-induced oxidative responses of a macrophage-like cell line from the rainbow trout, RTS11. Lipopolysaccharide dose-dependently increased oxidation of this probe by RTS11 cells, and a variety of other cell lines. This process was inhibited by catalase, superoxide dismutase and NG-methylarginine citrate, an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthases, suggesting the involvement of a diverse assortment of cellular ROS. More careful dissection of this phenomenon led us to conclude that the increase in oxidation was, in fact, due almost entirely to metals, particularly copper, in some LPS preparations, which is something to consider when experimenting with LPS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".