MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079936727 · doi:10.1089/ast.2009.0350

Silica Chimneys Formed by Low-Temperature Brine Spring Discharge

2009· article· en· W2079936727 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stephen E. Grasby, R. K. Bezys, B. Beauchamp

Bibliographic record

VenueAstrobiology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrineSpring (device)Hot springGeologyEnvironmental scienceGeochemistryMineralogyAstrobiologyChemistryEngineeringPaleontologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vertical pipes comprised of loose silica and lined by chert nodules have been observed in the abandoned Mafeking Quarry in central Manitoba, Canada. Discovery of microfossils within these features of the same age as the carbonate host rock indicates that they are a dissolution/replacement structure rather than infill of karst features by younger sediments. These features occur on the low thermal maturity edge of the intercratonic Williston Basin, are not associated with any known tectonic or hydrothermal activity, and show no sign of localized discharge of high-temperature fluids. Modern low-temperature brine springs with silica-filled discharge channels occur nearby, which suggests the silica chimneys are relic spring channels. Geochemical models have shown that dissolution/replacement reactions would be expected due to mixing of brine spring water with shallow groundwater in the region. Results indicate that silica pipe features in the rock record cannot be assumed to be indicative of hydrothermal activity. At the same time, results increase the astrobiological significance of low-temperature siliceous deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstrobiologySame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207