A Return to Roccagloriosa (Province of Salerno, South Italy)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian Excavations at Roccagloriosa supported by generous SSHRC Grants in the 1980s has produced a number of Field Reports and two substantial volumes on this important site of pre-Roman Italy. On-going research on the finds and the more recent campaigns of geophysical exploration have added crucial information on the level of complexity of the Lucanian site at the peak of its development. At the same time, the data emerging from the most recent field-work at the site provides a much more complete picture of the organization of the Central Plateau, the major agglomeration of buildings inside the massive fortification wall. Les missions archéologiques canadiennes à Roccagloriosa, généreusement supportées par les subventions du CRSH dans les années 1980, ont donné lieu à de nombreux rapports de fouilles, ainsi qu'à deux volumes substantiels sur cet important site de l'Italie préromaine. Les travaux de recherche en cours sur ces découvertes et les campagnes d'exploration géophysique plus récentes ont apporté un supplément d'information crucial concernant le niveau de complexité du site lucanien au faîte de son développement. Parallèlement, les données qui se dégagent de la plus récente campagne archéologique sur le site donnent une image plus complète de l'organisation du « plateau central », la principale agglomération d'habitations à l'intérieur des imposantes murailles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".