Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: This article argues that the dominant modern narrative of hope has collapsed in North America and that this is witnessed within the public and ecclesial spheres. While many near the centre of power struggle with hopelessness in the face of this collapse, the article insists that the collapse is both necessary and good. No longer can the modern Western narrative of hope meaningfully address the extent of contemporary crises; no longer can it ignore the multiple oppressions hidden by its dominance. The failure of this narrative of hope opens space for more resilient conceptions of hope to emerge. Affirming the work of Douglas John Hall, the article explores deeper bases for Christian hope through a theology of the cross. Experiences of unexpected possibility in the face of limit, finitude, oppression, and marginalization are held up as reflections of the hope of the cross. Finally, the article demonstrates hope of the cross through a discussion of Jonathan Lear's presentation of Plenty Coups, chief of the Crow Nation, as he leads his people through the colonizing arrival of European settlers to the land of the Crow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.050 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".