KPIM of Gas Transportation: Robust Modification of Gas Pipeline Equations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
KPIM of Gas Transportation: Robust Modification of Gas Pipeline Equations Studies of the flow conditions of natural gases in pipelines have led to the development of complex equations for relating the volume transmitted through a gas pipeline to the various factors involved, thus deciding the optimum pressures and pipeline dimensions to be used. From equations of this type, various combinations of pipe diameter and wall thickness for a desired rate of gas throughput can be calculated. This research work presents modified forms of the basic gas flow equation for horizontal flow developed by Weymouth and the basic gas flow equation for inclined flow developed by Ferguson. The modified equations incorporate non-iterative forms of the Colebrook-White friction factor into the original forms of the Weymouth's and Ferguson's equations. These modified equations thus eliminate the need for iteration in predicting the flow rate of gas through pipelines as is the case with their original forms when the Colebrook-White friction factor is used. The modified equations also have a wider range of application since the Colebrook-White friction factor is valid for turbulent gas flow as well as for gas flow in a transition zone. On comparing the results it can be seen that the modified Ferguson's equation gives a more accurate prediction of gas flow rates because it takes the pipeline elevation into account. Lower deviations from measured gas flow rates were observed with the modified Ferguson's equation than with the modified basic gas flow equation. The deviations observed using the modified Ferguson equation were found to range from -0.16% to +3.21%. Conclusively, these less cumbersome newly developed equations with high degree reliability will be useful in predicting the rates of gas flow for a wide range of its conditions, pipeline elevation and pipeline lengths.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".