Orchid–bird interactions: a case study from <i>Angraecum</i> (Vandeae, Angraecinae) and <i>Zosterops</i> (white-eyes, Zosteropidae) on Reunion Island
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although angraecoid orchids are famous for their spectacular flowers, pollinated by hawkmoths in Madagascar, two species of Angraecum endemic to the Mascarenes (sect. Hadrangis ) have atypical unscented and short-spurred flowers that are pollinated by birds. We focused on the pollination and reproductive success of Angraecum bracteosum Balf.f. & S.Moore, a member of sect. Hadrangis. We investigated the breeding system by performing a set of hand-pollination experiments and by observing natural pollinators using video-captures. Pollinator efficiency (pollen removal and deposition) and reproductive success (fruit set) were quantified once a week in two natural island populations during three consecutive flowering seasons (2003–2005). The orchid is self-compatible but requires pollinator services to achieve reproduction. The two white-eye song-bird species (Zosteropidae) that occur on Reunion, Zosterops borbonicus Boddaert and Zosterops olivaceus L., were recorded as pollinators. However, while pollination events were rare and occasional following flower visits by Z. borbonicus, foraging of Z. oliveaceus resulted in a high frequency of successful pollinations. White-eyes typically perched on inflorescences, and probed most of the “fresh-looking” flowers for nectar. This study documents a probable case of bird-pollination specialization within Angraecum section Hadrangis, and sheds light on the role played by pollinators during the radiation of section Hadrangis in the Mascarene Archipelago.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".