MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080069329 · doi:10.1063/1.2716390

Symmetry segregation of the vibronic levels within the S1←S system of thiophosgene, Cl2CS, by optical-optical double resonance spectroscopy

2007· article· en· W2080069329 on OpenAlexafffund
Takashige Fujiwara, Edward C. Lim, D. C. Moule

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Spectroscopy and Structure
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersBasic Energy SciencesNational Research Council CanadaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsChemistrySinglet stateSpectroscopyResonance (particle physics)DipoleAtomic physicsExcitationSymmetry (geometry)Antisymmetric relationVibronic spectroscopyLaserMolecular electronic transitionFluorescenceMolecular physicsExcited statePhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first singlet-singlet electronic system, S1<--S0, in thiophosgene has been recorded as a laser induced fluorescence (LIF) excitation and an optical-optical double resonance (OODR) spectrum under jet-cooled conditions. In the OODR process, the sum of the frequencies of the pump and probe lasers must be fixed to the energy difference between a pair of vibronic levels in the S2(v') and S0(v") states. Detection is through the fluorescence from the S2 state. The blocking of a spectrum into its four possible symmetry components is obtained by adjusting the total pump+probe energy such that it matches the energy difference between symmetry selected levels in the S2 and S0 electronic states. In this method the pump laser is used to excite a group of "hot" sequence bands that involve combinations of the nu4 and nu6 antisymmetric vibrations. The additional data that were collected by this method were used to update and refine the analyses of the spectrum. Magnetic dipole transitions are reported for the first time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicMolecular Spectroscopy and StructureFrench-language works237,207