MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080115611 · doi:10.1021/ja000441i

Using Incoming Nucleophile Primary Hydrogen−Deuterium Kinetic Isotope Effects To Model the S<sub>N</sub>2 Transition State

2000· article· en· W2080115611 on OpenAlexafffund
Terry Koerner, Yao‐ren Fang, Kenneth Charles Westaway

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistrySubstituentKinetic isotope effectNucleophileDeuteriumLeaving groupMedicinal chemistrySN2 reactionTransition stateHydrogen bondPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryMoleculeCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary hydrogen−deuterium incoming nucleophile KIEs for the S N 2 reactions between para-substituted benzyl chlorides and borohydride ion in DMSO at 30.000 ± 0.002 °C are small (≤1.14) and insensitive to a change in substituent at the α-carbon. The small Hammett ρ (0.51) and ρ r (−0.52) values found when the para substituent on the benzene ring of the substrate is altered indicate there is very little charge on the α-carbon in the transition state. The large, constant secondary α-deuterium KIEs of 1.089 ± 0.002 and the large chlorine leaving group KIEs of 1.0076, 1.0074, and 1.0078 found for the p -methyl-, the p -hydrogen-, and the p -chlorobenzyl chloride reactions suggest that the transition states for these reactions are unsymmetric with short H−C α and long B−Η and C α −Cl bonds. The decrease in the chlorine leaving group KIE from 1.0076 ± 0.0003 for the p -methylbenzyl chloride reaction to 1.0036 ± 0.0003 for the p -nitrobenzyl chloride reaction indicates the C α −Cl bond shortens markedly when a strongly electron-withdrawing substituent is on the α-carbon. Unfortunately, the bond strength hypothesis is the only theory that predicts the changes observed in transition-state structure and it only indicates the bond that changes but not how the transition-state structure is altered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicChemical Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207