Telophase-Stage Host Ooplasts Support Complete Reprogramming of Roscovitine-Treated Somatic Cell Nuclei in Cattle
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nuclear-cytoplasmic incompatibilities are known to play a significant role in the developmental outcome of embryos produced by nuclear transfer, particularly when metaphase arrested oocytes are used as hosts for interphase donor nuclei. To further our understanding of how cell cycle coordination affects somatic cell cloning, somatic cells at different stages of the cell cycle were fused to host oocytes either before (metaphase II, M-II) or after (telophase II, T-II) activation. To obtain cells at different stages of the cell cycle, fetal fibroblast (FF) and granulosa cells (GC) were treated with roscovitine, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) resulting in a large percentage of cells in S/G(2)-phase. In contrast to the M-II group, which did better with confluent cells, embryos reconstructed with T-II cytoplasts resulted in higher rates of blastocyst formation when fused to cells recovered at 16-24 h after passage. Embryos reconstructed with FF treated with roscovitine and T-II cytoplasts (Rosc/T-II) resulted in similar blastocyst rate compared to those produced with confluent cells and M-II cytoplasts (Conf/M-II). Transfer of blastocysts to surrogate heifers resulted pregnancies and birth of healthy calves from Rosc/T-II and Conf/M-II reconstructed embryos. These results indicate that, when combined with nuclear donor cells at specific cell cycle stages, M-II and T-II bovine oocytes are similarly effective in supporting the reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it