Development of a New Model to Investigate the Fetal Nociceptive Pathways
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to develop an experimental model to investigate the fetal nociceptive pathways and fetal analgesia. METHODS: We tested the electromyographic (EMG) response from the biceps femoris to electrical stimulation of the sural nerve in chronically-prepared fetal lambs with and without sufentanil. RESULTS: An EMG response could be recorded 140 ms after the electrical stimulation above a threshold of current's intensity. The response presents the characteristics of a nociceptive flexion reflex. The reflex magnitude increased with the stimulus intensity. Sufentanil decreased the response. Bradycardia was noted 10 s after the stimulation and was not observed after sufentanilinfusion. Catecholamine concentrations were not altered by the stimulation. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that a nociceptive flexion reflex can be recorded in the ovine fetus. We suggest that this reflex can be used as a new tool to study the ontogenesis of the nociceptive pathways and the effects of analgesic drugs during fetal life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".