Mass-Marking Reveals Emerging Self Regulation of the Chinook Salmon Population in Lake Huron
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract All Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha stocked in Lake Huron during 2000–2003 were marked with oxytetracycline (OTC), fin clips, or a combination thereof to determine the relative contributions of natural reproduction and stocking to recruitment. Oxytetracycline administered in feed proved to be an effective, low-cost method of marking spring fingerling Chinook salmon. Vertebrae proved to be suitable tissue for OTC detection, meeting standards for accuracy and reproducibility. Vertebrae were not suitable as aging structures, perhaps due to the slow somatic growth of Lake Huron's Chinook salmon during this study. Based on lakewide recoveries from recreational and commercial fisheries, we estimated that nearly 80% of Chinook salmon from the marked year-classes were from natural reproduction. Wild-origin Chinook salmon constituted 96% of open-water samples from Georgian Bay; 82, 80, and 68% of those from the central, southern, and northern portions of the main basin; and 64% of those from the North Channel. The percentage of wild-origin Chinook salmon in some tributaries in the Ontario watershed of Lake Huron approached 100%. There was less variation in wild recruitment between years than between lake areas. This Chinook salmon population was introduced in the late 1960s and until recently had been widely viewed as hatchery dependent; our findings suggest otherwise. A self-sustaining predator population would represent a paradigm shift from an era when predation rates could be manipulated by adjusting salmonid stocking (i.e., 1968 to about 1995). These findings should help managers to critically review the effects of stocked Chinook salmon on Lake Huron's fisheries and ecosystem, including prey consumption demand, and to assess future needs for propagated Chinook salmon in Lake Huron.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".