MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080269759 · doi:10.1021/jp062441w

Deuterium NMR of the TGBA* Phase in Chiral Liquid Crystals

2006· article· en· W2080269759 on OpenAlexaff
J. Zhang, Valentina Domenici, C. A. Veracini, Ronald Y. Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiquid crystalDeuteriumNMR spectra databasePhase (matter)Deuterium NMRDiffusionSpectral lineProton NMRMaterials scienceTwistMagnetic fieldChemistryNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyNuclear magnetic resonanceCrystallographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ThermodynamicsOrganic chemistryPhysicsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A deuterium NMR (DNMR) study of the TGBA* (twist grain boundary smectic A*) phase in an NMR magnetic field of 9.4 T for the chiral compound 4-[4'-(1-methyl heptyloxy)] biphenyl 4-(10-undecenyloxy) benzoate (11EB1M7) is reported. The deuterium two-dimensional (2D) exchange spectra were observed for the first time in this phase. The present study allows us to learn how the helicoidal structures arrange in an external magnetic field. To derive quantitative kinetic parameters of this novel phase, both 1D and 2D experimental spectra were simulated by means of a jump diffusion model. By comparing the experimental and simulated spectra, an accurate determination of the dynamic parameters in the TGBA* phase was obtained. Furthermore, the twist angle between two neighboring smectic A blocks is found as 26 +/- 10 degrees, which is consistent with the X-ray results for similar chiral liquid crystals. The diffusion constant (D(parallel)) is estimated to be 3.2 x 10(-12) m(2)/s at 379.5 K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207