MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080294217 · doi:10.1021/ja004309u

On the Stability of Double Stranded Nucleic Acids

2001· article· en· W2080294217 on OpenAlexaff
David N. Dubins, Adrian V. Lee, Robert B. Macgregor, Tigran V. Chalikian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryNucleic acidDouble strandedDNABiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the first pressure-versus-temperature phase diagram for the helix-to-coil transition of double stranded nucleic acids. The thermodynamic stability of a nucleic acid duplex is a complex function of temperature and pressure and strongly depends on the denaturation temperature, T(M), of the duplex at atmospheric pressure. Depending upon T(M), pressure, and temperature, the phase diagram shows that pressure may stabilize, destabilize, or have no effect on the conformational state of DNA. To verify the phase diagram, we have conducted high-pressure UV melting experiments on poly(dIdC)poly(dIdC), a DNA duplex, poly(rA)poly(rU), an RNA duplex, and poly(dA)poly(rU), a DNA/RNA hybrid duplex. The T(M) values of these duplexes have been modulated by altering the solution ionic strength. Significantly, at low salt, these three duplexes have helix-to-coil transition temperatures of 50 degrees C or less. In agreement with the derived phase diagram, we found that the polymeric duplexes were destabilized by pressure if the T(M) is < approximately 50 degrees C. However, these duplexes were stabilized by pressure if the T(M) is > approximately 50 degrees C. The DNA/RNA hybrid duplex, poly(dA)poly(rU), with a T(M) of 31 degrees C in 20 mM NaCl undergoes a pressure-induced helix-to-coil transition at room temperature. This is the first report of pressure-induced denaturation of a nucleic acid duplex and provides new insights into the molecular forces stabilizing these structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations90
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207