Histone genes of the razor clam<i>Solen marginatus</i>unveil new aspects of linker histone evolution in protostomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The association of DNA with histones results in a nucleoprotein complex called chromatin that consists of repetitive nucleosomal subunits. Nucleosomes are joined together in the chromatin fiber by short stretches of linker DNA that interact with a wide diversity of linker H1 histones involved in chromatin compaction and dynamics. Although the long-term evolution of the H1 family has been the subject of different studies during the last 5 years, the lack of molecular data on replication-independent (RI) H1 variants from protostomes has been hampering attempts to complete the evolutionary picture of this histone family in eukaryotes, especially as it pertains to the functional specialization they impart to the chromatin structure in members of this bilaterian lineage. In an attempt to fill this gap, the present work characterizes the histone gene complement from the razor clam Solen marginatus. Molecular evolutionary analyses reveal that the H1 gene from this organism represents one of the few protostome RI H1 genes known to date, a notion which is further supported by its location within the monophyletic group encompassing the RI H1 variants in the overall phylogeny of eukaryotic H1 proteins. Although the detailed characterization of the nucleotide substitution patterns in RI H1 variants agrees with the model of birth-and-death evolution under strong purifying selection, maximum-likelihood approaches unveil the presence of adaptive selection during at least part of the evolutionary differentiation between protostomes and deuterostomes. The presence of increased levels of specialization in RI H1 proteins from deuterostomes as well as the significant differences observed in electrostatic properties between protostome and deuterostome RI H1s represent novel and important preliminary results for future studies of the functional differentiation of this histone H1 lineage across bilaterians.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".