MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080402857 · doi:10.1002/jcp.20983

Adenovirus E1A proteins direct subcellular redistribution of Nek9, A NimA‐related kinase

2007· article· en· W2080402857 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter Pelka, Anthony Scimè, Christina Mandalfino, Monica Joch, Parween Abdulla, Peter Whyte

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Physiology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsRedistribution (election)Cell biologyKinaseSubcellular localizationProtein kinase AChemistryCytoplasmBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A monoclonal antibody raised against adenovirus E1A-associated cellular proteins recognized Nek9, a NimA-related protein kinase. Subcellular fractionation and immunofluorescence indicated that Nek9 was primarily cytoplasmic with a small portion located in the nucleus whereas E1A was primarily nuclear. Although co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that nuclear Nek9 interacted, directly or indirectly, with E1A, the major effect of E1A was to diminish the amount of Nek9 in the nucleus suggesting that E1A alters the subcellular distribution of Nek9 and that the interaction is transient. A Nek9 deletion mutant lacking a central RCC1-like domain interacted stably with E1A and accumulated in the nucleus in the presence of E1A, possibly representing an intermediate stage of the normally transient Nek9/E1A interaction. The interaction of Nek9 with E1A was dependent on the N-terminal sequences of E1A. Attempts to stably overexpress either Nek9 or the kinase-inactive mutant in various cell lines were unsuccessful; however, the presence of E1A allowed stable overexpression of both proteins. These results suggest that E1A disrupts a nuclear function of Nek9.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular PhysiologySame topicCellular transport and secretionFrench-language works237,207