MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080418351 · doi:10.4021/jnr.v3i2.208

Severe Neuropathy and Tetraparesis Induced by Adalimumab

2013· article· en· W2080418351 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Željko Vučičević, Vesna Degoricija, L. Dežmalj-Grbelja

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTetraparesisAdalimumabSurgeryPolyneuropathyPeripheral neuropathyDenervationWeaknessMethylprednisoloneAnesthesiaRheumatoid arthritisInternal medicineMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a case of severe axonal and demyelinating peripheral polyneuropathy with consecutive tetraparesis following the second application of adalimumab in a 55-year-old man with rheumatoid arthritis. The treatment provided 40 mg of adalimumab s.c. every 2 weeks. Modest muscle pain and weakness followed the first dose, but the second dose resulted in progressive tetraparesis and complete immobility. Electroneurography revealed almost complete denervation of all muscles of the upper extremities, and no motor response at the lower extremities. The finding was suggestive of severe subchronic axonal and demyelinating peripheral polyneuropathy induced by adalimumab. A comprehensive medical work out excluded the possibility of other etiology. At discharge, methylprednisolone was continued for the next 3 months. Nine months of physical rehabilitation and supportive treatment resulted in a modest recovery. Anti-TNF- α agents may induce vasculitis neuropathy at any time during treatment which must be distinguished from the neuropathy of the underlying disease. Appropriate therapy should be initiated immediately and continued long enough. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jnr189e

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.603

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology ResearchSame topicPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersFrench-language works237,207