MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080429026 · doi:10.1115/imece2010-38903

Electro-Thermal Icing Mitigation System for Polymeric Composite Airfoil

2010· article· en· W2080429026 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Mohseni, Pierre Mertiny, Alidad Amirfazli

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCenter for Power Optimization of Electro-Thermal Systems
KeywordsIcingMaterials scienceComposite numberComposite materialThermalIcing conditionsThermocoupleWind tunnelAirfoilWind powerThermal conductivityStructural engineeringMeteorologyAerospace engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polymer composite materials are widely used in aircraft and wind turbine industries due to their high specific stiffness and strength. In this study the concept of an electro-thermal anti-icing system is developed using composite material. Controlling temperature distribution and minimizing energy consumption can be the main benefits of such an anti-icing system. The thermal behavior of a composite material, power consumption and the type of thermal system were characterized for designing the icing mitigation system. Constantan wires as thermal elements were embedded inside fiberglass/epoxy composite laminates, and the thermal characteristics of the system at specific power levels were investigated using thermocouples in a wind tunnel under room temperature and cold room conditions. When applying power, the surface temperature reached 50% of its final steady-state value in 20s. To obtain a relatively uniform temperature distribution and prevent the formation of cold spots on the surface, the maximum distance between the thermal elements was 1cm. The temperature of different points on the surface increased with increasing power, and its trend was the same in room temperature and cold room tests. In cold room tests, a surface temperature above 5°C was reached at the thermal elements and between them at 0.42 W/cm, which is sufficient to prevent ice formation in icing condition. This power did not cause thermal degradation of the composite material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207