The effectiveness of discontinuing iron-containing prenatal multivitamins on reducing the severity of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) is experienced by the majority of pregnant women, and can negatively affect a women's quality of life. It has been suggested in observational studies that iron-containing prenatal multivitamins may increase the severity of NVP. The objective of this study was to determine whether decreasing iron exposure can mitigate NVP symptoms. Data were collected from a prospective cohort at the Motherisk Program in Toronto. Women (n = 97) seeking advice on managing severe NVP were advised to discontinue prenatal multivitamin administration and switch to folic acid, an adult multivitamin or a children's chewable multivitamin. Two-thirds (63 out of 97) (p < 0.001) of those women qualitatively reported an improvement in NVP symptoms after discontinuation of iron-containing prenatal multivitamins. These findings were verified quantitatively using both the pregnancy-unique quantification of emesis and nausea (PUQE) (p < 0.001) and well-being (p < 0.001) scoring systems. This is the first interventional study showing that discontinuation of iron results in improvement of NVP symptoms. Our data suggest that avoiding iron-containing prenatal multivitamins in the first trimester is effective in improving NVP symptoms in the majority of pregnant women suffering from morning sickness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".