MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080559673 · doi:10.1074/jbc.c400226200

The Brain-specific Double-stranded RNA-binding Protein Staufen2

2004· article· en· W2080559673 on OpenAlexaff
Paolo Macchi, Amy M. Brownawell, Barbara Grunewald, Luc DesGroseillers, Ian G. Macara, Michael Kiebler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRNABiologyRNA-binding proteinNucleolusCell biologyNuclear export signalSmall nuclear RNAMessenger RNAMutantMolecular biologyNon-coding RNAGeneticsGeneNucleus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mammalian double-stranded RNA-binding proteins Staufen (Stau1 and Stau2) are involved in RNA localization in polarized neurons. In contrast to the more ubiquitously expressed Stau1, Stau2 is mainly expressed in the nervous system. In Drosophila, the third double-stranded RNA-binding domain (RBD3) of Staufen is essential for RNA interaction. When conserved amino acids within the RBD3 of Stau2 were mutated to render Stau2 defective for RNA binding, the mutant Stau2 proteins accumulate predominantly in the nucleolus. This is in contrast to wild type Stau2 that mostly localizes in the cytosol. The nuclear import is dependent on a nuclear localization signal in close proximity to the RBD3. The nuclear export of Stau2 is not dependent on CRM1 but rather on Exportin-5. We show that Exportin-5 interacts with the RBD3 of wild type Stau2 in an RNA-dependent manner in vitro but not with mutant Stau2. When Exportin-5 is down-regulated by RNA interference, only the largest isoform of Stau2 (Stau2(62)) preferentially accumulates in the nucleolus. It is tempting to speculate that Stau2(62) binds RNA in the nucleus and assembles into ribonucleoparticles, which are then exported via the Exportin-5 pathway to their final destination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207