MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080595136 · doi:10.1021/jm900365v

Synthetic Analogue of Rocaglaol Displays a Potent and Selective Cytotoxicity in Cancer Cells: Involvement of Apoptosis Inducing Factor and Caspase-12

2009· article· en· W2080595136 on OpenAlexaff
Frédéric Thuaud, Yohann Bernard, Gülen Türkeri, Ronan Dirr, Geneviève Aubert, Thierry Cresteil, Aurélie Baguet, Catherine Tomasetto, Yuri V. Svitkin, Nahum Sonenberg, Canan G. Nebigil, Laurent Désaubry

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhytochemical compounds biological activities
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCytotoxicityApoptosisCaspaseCaspase 3Programmed cell deathCancer cellCaspase 8Cancer researchPharmacologyIn vitroCancerBiochemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flavaglines constitute a family of natural anticancer compounds. We present here 3 (FL3), the first synthetic flavagline that inhibits cell proliferation and viability (IC(50) approximately 1 nM) at lower doses than did the parent compound, racemic rocaglaol. Compound 3 enhanced doxorubicin cytotoxicity in HepG2 cells and retained its potency against adriamycin-resistant cell lines without inducing cardiomyocyte toxicity. Compound 3 induced apoptosis of HL60 and Hela cells by triggering the translocation of Apoptosis Inducing Factor (AIF) and caspase-12 to the nucleus. A fluorescent conjugate of 3 accumulated in endoplasmic reticulum (ER), suggesting that flavaglines bind to their target in the ER, where it triggers a cascade of events that leads to the translocation of AIF and caspase-12 to the nucleus and probably inhibition of eIF4A. Our studies highlight structural features critical to their antineoplastic potential and suggest that these compounds would retain their activity in cells refractory to caspase activation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations114
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicinal ChemistrySame topicPhytochemical compounds biological activitiesFrench-language works237,207