MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080633485 · doi:10.1061/40555(2001)120

Scour Repairs at Port of Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

2001· article· en· W2080633485 on OpenAlexaffabout
R. G. Mills, John King, Joe Salvo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaterials Engineering and Processing
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaHarbourCaissonSheet pileBedrockPort (circuit theory)PebblePileRubbleGeologyContainer (type theory)EngineeringForensic engineeringOceanographyGeotechnical engineeringGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Halterm Container Terminal is located at the entrance to Halifax Harbour on Nova Scotia's Atlantic Coast. The harbour has a natural depth of about 18 m, and is ice free year round. Halterm is one of the most important container terminals on the Canadian East Coast and total throughput for the 12 month period ending August 2000 exceeded 500,000 TEU. In recent years Halterm has been accepting ever larger container ships and in mid-1999 berthed the Regina Maersk, the world's largest container ship at that time. Various methods of repairing the undermining were considered including the use of bagged concrete and large armour stone, but ultimately it was determined that the best long term solution involved the use of steel sheet pile and underwater (tremie) concrete. Steel sheet pile was selected for two reasons, 1) to retain the tremie concrete used to fill the void under the caisson, and 2) to prevent future undermining of the caisson. In the undermined location there was an insufficient thickness of material above bedrock to provide the lateral resistance necessary to retain the tremie concrete and there was also the possibility that this same material would wash out after the repair was complete. It was therefore deemed necessary to key the bottom of the sheet pile into the bedrock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0840.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMaterials Engineering and ProcessingFrench-language works237,207