MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080644593 · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.008

Comparative Histological and Functional Controlled Analysis of Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty With and Without Dorsal Inlay Graft: A Preliminary Experimental Study in Rabbits

2011· article· en· W2080644593 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno Leslie, Lisieux Eyer de Jesus, Yaser El‐Hout, Katherine Moore, Walid A. Farhat, Darius Bägli, Armando J. Lorenzo, João L. Pippi Salle

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInlayMedicineDorsumUrethroplastySurgeryAnatomyDentistryUrethra

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: We analyzed the histological and functional characteristics of the tubularized incised plate vs dorsal inlay graft urethroplasty in an experimental rabbit model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 24 New Zealand male rabbits were randomly allocated into 4 groups, including sham operation, urethroplasty, tubularized incised plate urethroplasty and dorsal inlay graft urethroplasty. In the urethroplasty group the anterior urethral wall was half excised and the dorsal aspect was tubularized. In the tubularized incised plate group the same steps were followed but tubularization followed a longitudinal midline incision in the dorsal wall. In the dorsal inlay graft group the defect created by the dorsal incision was covered with an inner preputial graft. The animals were sacrificed at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. The penis was immediately harvested for standardized passive flowmetry and subsequently fixed for histological staining. RESULTS: The grafts took in all animals. The tubularized incised plate defect was bridged by urothelium while in the dorsal inlay graft group the preputial graft kept its original histological characteristics. There was a significant decrease in average flow in the urethroplasty group (1.6 ml per second) compared to that in the sham operated group (3.4 ml per second) and to the other groups (p <0.05). However, no significant difference in average flow was found for the tubularized incised plate and dorsal inlay graft groups (2.4 and 2.2 ml per second, respectively, p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: In this short-term rabbit model dorsal inlay graft urethroplasty was feasible with good graft take and integration. Simple tubularization of a reduced urethral plate led to significantly decreased flow. Incision of the reduced plate with or without grafting improved the average flow. Findings in this experimental model do not support the superiority of dorsal inlay graft urethroplasty over tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in terms of urethral flow dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicUrological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207