Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study is interesting as a negative study. It shows that the type of luteinizing hormone releasing-hormone (LHRH) agonists and primary therapy is not significant when it comes to testosterone levels.1 This commentary focuses on the actual testosterone levels, which are clinically relevant as many patients were experiencing breakthrough levels on LHRH agonists. Chemically castrate status in terms of testosterone has been argued to be 20 ng/dL or 50 ng/dL, which converts to 0.69 nmol/L or 1.7 nmol/L.2 Current consensus is 20 ng/dL, which bilateral surgical castration typically achieves.3 The median values reported in this study for LHRH alone, radiation and surgery were 40, 37 and 36 ng/dL, or 1.4, 1.3 and 1.25 nmol/L, respectively. The interquartile ranges also suggest that most patients (75%) did not have castrate levels of testosterone. Admittedly, this study does mention testosterone was only obtained once and circumstances surrounding it were uncertain. Anti-androgen status is also not mentioned. Bicalutamide and other anti-androgens are known to elevate testosterone levels as monotherapy and may have a confounding effect on the testosterone levels reported. Most likely testosterone was measured when prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was rising on LHRH agonist and one can surmise that the ordering physician was looking for and found “testosterone escape” (a single value above 50 ng/dL or 1.7 nmol/L) in many of the patients in this study.4 Although as stated previously, perhaps 20 ng/dL should be the current definition. The importance of testosterone escape is backed by several studies. It is known anti-androgens do not help orchiectomy patients in overall survival, but do for patients on LHRH agonists.5 Breakthrough testosterone levels on medication that did not occur for surgically castrate patients would be a likely explanation. Progression-free survival in non-metastatic patients in another study was longer, the lower the testosterone level.6 In this clinical scenario of testosterone escape, standard treatment was switching LHRH agonists, adding an anti-androgen and bilateral orchiectomy. Now, a new option with LHRH antagonists arises. It has been reported to have modest results with respect to decreasing PSA, but can possibly alleviate voiding symptoms more than LHRH agonist therapy.7 Regardless, the actual testosterone level is important for patients on LHRH agonists with rising PSA. Venkateswaran and colleagues make the case that it should be checked no matter what the primary therapy.1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".