MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080669340 · doi:10.1080/08982112.2012.641151

Statistical Engineering—Roles for Statisticians and the Path Forward

2012· article· en· W2080669340 on OpenAlexaff
Christine M. Anderson‐Cook, Lu Lu, Gordon L. Clark, Stephanie P. DeHart, Roger W. Hoerl, Bradley Jones, Robert J. MacKay, Douglas C. Montgomery, Peter A. Parker, James Simpson, Ronald D. Snee, Stefan Steiner, Jennifer Van Mullekom, Geoff Vining, Alyson G. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality Engineering · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistics Education and Methodologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPath (computing)Government (linguistics)MarketingManagement scienceEngineeringComputer scienceData scienceOperations researchEngineering managementBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Statistical engineering (SE) is a term that has been around in the statistical literature for more than 60 years. Over the years, it has been defined and used by a number of different groups and or...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.254
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.270
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2540.270
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0100.044
Scholarly communication0.0270.044
Open science0.0060.015
Research integrity0.0260.055
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuality EngineeringSame topicStatistics Education and MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207