A TrkB Antibody Agonist Promotes Plasticity after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Adult Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After spinal cord injury (SCI) in mammals, there is only limited repair and, consequently, only moderate recovery. One mechanism frequently discussed to be involved in this recovery is plasticity (i.e., adaptations in spared neuronal circuitries). In the current study, we tested the effect of an intrathecal application of the TrkB agonist antibody, 29D7, on plasticity after cervical SCI in adult rats. Treatment with 29D7 for 4 weeks resulted in an ∼50% increase in collateral sprouting of severed corticospinal tract fibers above the lesion compared to the control group and enhanced branching in the gray matter rostral to the injury. Growth-associated protein 43 immunoreactivity in the spinal cord rostral to the level of the injury as well as contralateral to the lesion was also increased. These indications of enhanced plasticity by 29D7 were paralleled by improved performances of the mildly affected paw, as assessed by Montoya and tray reaching tasks. The reaching behaviors of the paw ipsilateral to the side of severe injury to the cortico- and rubrospinal tract were not altered by the treatment. The present study suggests that 29D7 may be a potential candidate to promote plasticity and functional recovery, especially after moderate SCI. Future studies confirming these results, along with a potential combinatory therapy including rehabilitative training, will be needed to evaluate the clinical value of such a treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".