pH Dependent Electrochemical Characterization, Computational Studies and Evaluation of Thermodynamic, Kinetic and Analytical Parameters of Two Phenazines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrochemical response of two biologically important phenazine derivatives was examined by using cyclic, differential pulse and square wave voltammetry in a wide pH range of 2.0 – 12.0. Cyclic voltammetry was employed for the determination of heterogeneous electron transfer rate constant and diffusion coefficient of the analytes. The value of electron transfer rate constant was used for evaluation of Gibbs free energy, enthalpy and entropy changes of redox reactions of the compounds. Differential pulse voltammetry was used for the determination of number of protons and electrons involved in the redox processes. Limits of detection and quantification were assessed by square wave voltammetry. The detailed pH dependent redox mechanisms of the compounds were proposed on the basis of experimental results which were further supported by theoretical calculations. These redox mechanistic pathways are expected to play a key role in understanding the necessary aspects of structure-activity relationships and exploring the hidden routes by which this class of compounds exert its biochemical actions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".