Donor-Functionalized Lanthanide Terphenyl Complexes: Synthesis and Structural Characterization of 2,6-Di(<i>o</i>-anisol)phenyl Compounds of Ytterbium, Yttrium, and Samarium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The syntheses and molecular structures of a number of 2,6-di(o-anisol)phenyl ([double bond]Danip-) -based bis(amide) and bis(alkoxide) compounds of ytterbium, yttrium, and samarium are reported. Additionally, NMR spectroscopic data are reported for the analogous diamagnetic yttrium compounds. Salt metathesis reaction of equimolar amounts of DanipLi and YbCl(3) in tetrahydrofuran at room temperature followed by addition of 2 equiv of KN(SiMe(3))(2) or KN(SiHMe(2))(2) produces DanipYb[N(SiMe(3))(2)](2) (1) and DanipYb[N(SiHMe(2))(2)](2) (2), respectively. The analogous reaction using SmCl(3) and KN(SiHMe(2))(2) produces DanipSm[N(SiHMe(2))(2)](2) (3). Reaction of DanipLi and YbCl(3) in tetrahydrofuran at room temperature followed by addition of 2 equiv of KO(2,6-diisopropylphenyl) produces DanipYb[O(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)](2) (4). Our attempts to also prepare the yttrium analogue of complex 4 yielded single-crystalline material of the tetrahydrofuran adduct DanipY(THF)[O(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)](2) (5). The molecular structures of the complexes 1-4 feature five-coordinate metal atoms and coordination polyhedra which can be described as distorted square-pyramidal rather than trigonal-bipyramidal, with the ipso carbon atom occupying the apical position. On the other hand, the molecular structure of the tetrahydrofuran-solvated yttrium Danip arylalkoxide compound 5 features a six-coordinate metal atom in a distorted trigonal-prismatic coordination environment. In all cases the Danip ligand system adopts the chiral (racemic) d,l form.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".