Reduction of pain and side effects in the treatment of solar lentigines with pneumatic skin flattening (PSF)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Energy densities utilized in the treatment of pigmented lesions such as solar lentigines with intense pulsed light systems are often limited by pain and post-treatment erythema and edema. The sensation of pain associated with the treatment is immediate and acute. Application of topical anesthesia is time-consuming, with only very moderate pain relief. OBJECTIVE: (a) To test pain reduction as well as the reduction of post-treatment erythema and edema when using pneumatic skin flattening (PSF). This new technology utilizes an evacuation chamber to generate skin compression and activates tactile neural receptors in the skin. The result is an afferent inhibition of pain transmission in the dorsal horn (the 'gate theory'). (b) To test the efficacy of PSF. METHODS: Twenty patients were treated for solar lentigines. The patients were treated by three different IPLs. The evaluation of acute pain and post-treatment erythema and edema was performed on all 20 patients: one to three sites per patient treated with PSF and the same number of control sites without PSF. Identical energies and IPL were applied to both sites on each patient. The pain evaluation was performed on a 10-level scale modified McGill Pain Questionnaire. The clinical response to treatment was also evaluated. RESULTS: All 20 patients completed the study and preferred the PSF treatment side over the non-PSF side. Substantial pain reduction was observed in 19/20 patients (95%). The average reduction of pain was by two levels, from very painful to very mild pain. Erythema reductions were observed on 14/18 (77%) patients and edema reduction on 8/9 (88%) patients. Treatment efficacy on PSF sites was identical to that of non-PSF sites. CONCLUSION: The pneumatic skin flattening (PSF) technology considerably reduces pain, erythema and edema in the treatment of solar lentigines by IPLs. Treatment efficacy is preserved. The enhanced safety of PSF enables the increase of energy density and the acceleration of results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".