PS1-25: Cervical Cancer Testing and Follow-up in Four Managed Care Plans, 1998-2007
Bibliographic record
Abstract
HMORN 2012 -Selected Abstracts (10/151), SAs=5.5% (16/292).One-fifth of survivors (SA=22% (65/290), SA=18% (28/154)) reported volunteering on a regular basis an average of 11 (SOs) to 15 (SAs) hours/week.SAs reported more support from employers than SOs (64% (138/215) vs. 53% (60/113), p<.05), and from co-workers (68% (146/214) vs. 57% (64/112), p<.05).SAs and SOs did not differ in marital status at times of diagnosis or survey.The distribution of marital status shifted between diagnosis and survey: 72% (305/425) were married and 10% (43/425) were widowed at diagnosis; 62% (263/424) were married and 20% (84/424) were widowed at time of survey.No differences were reported by treatment about being forced into retirement.Discussion: Compared to SOs, SAs were more likely to be currently employed, to receive higher rates of support from employers and coworkers, and to volunteer more hours.Perhaps interventions can be developed to allow ostomy survivors to participate more in these functions in their communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".