Effects of probucol on changes of antioxidant enzymes in adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy in rats
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The clinical usefulness of doxorubicin (adriamycin, ADR) is restricted by the risk of developing congestive heart failure. Probucol has been reported to completely prevent ADR cardiomyopathy without interfering with its antitumor effects. The current study investigated the effects of ADR and probucol on antioxidant enzyme gene expression during adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy in a rat model. METHODS: The mRNA abundance by Northern and immunoreactive protein levels by Western blotting of myocardial antioxidant enzymes, glutathione peroxidase (GSHPx), manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) and catalase (CAT) were examined in relation to the enzyme activities in hemodynamically assessed control and treated animals. RESULTS: At 3 weeks post-treatment duration, ADR caused heart failure which was prevented by probucol. MnSOD mRNA abundance as well as protein levels were depressed by ADR treatment by 45% and 20%, respectively, and this change was prevented by probucol. However, the mRNA and protein levels of GSHPx and CAT were not significantly changed by ADR or probucol. ADR had no effect on SOD activity but this enzyme activity was increased by probucol and probucol plus ADR. GSHPx enzyme activity was decreased and oxidative stress as indicated by TBARS was increased by ADR and these changes were also modulated by probucol. CONCLUSION: An increase in oxidative stress, GSHPx inactivation and MnSOD downregulation during ADR cardiomyopathy were prevented by probucol treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it