MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081000061 · doi:10.1021/ja0557029

A Mild Pummerer-Like Reaction of Carbohydrate-Based Selenoethers and Thioethers Involving Linear Ozonide Acetates as Putative Intermediates

2005· article· en· W2081000061 on OpenAlexaff
Natacha Veerapen, Stephanie A. Taylor, Charles J. Walsby, B. Mario Pinto

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPummerer rearrangementChemistryAcetic anhydrideOzonideSulfoxideSulfurReaction intermediatePhotochemistrySigmatropic reactionOrganic chemistryOzonolysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pummerer-like rearrangements of carbohydrate-based heterocycles containing selenium and sulfur were investigated. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the Pummerer rearrangement in selenoheterocycles. Ozonization of 1,4-anhydro-D-galactitol or 1,5-anhydroxylitol derivatives containing sulfur or selenium as the ring heteroatom gave unstable intermediates that were attributed to ozonides. These intermediates decomposed upon warming to give selenoxides or sulfoxides. Significantly, addition of acetic anhydride at low temperature to the ozonization reaction mixtures gave Pummerer-rearrangement products after warming to ambient temperature. However, when the isolated selenoxides or sulfoxides were treated with acetic anhydride, Pummerer rearrangement occurred but the sulfoxides required much higher reaction temperatures. The latter results are at variance with the former and are interpreted in terms of the rearrangement of the ozonide acetate intermediates in the former cases. To probe whether the rearrangement proceeded heterolytically via extrusion of singlet oxygen or homolytically via the generation of radical species, trapping experiments with rubrene and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) studies with the radical trap DMPO were performed. The results of these experiments are consistent with the intermediacy of radical species and suggest a new and milder synthetic method to generate Pummerer-type products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicSulfur-Based Synthesis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207