MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081078912 · doi:10.1139/z03-081

Seasonal diving patterns and body temperatures of juvenile green turtles at Heron Island, Australia

2003· article· en· W2081078912 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amanda L. Southwood, Richard D. Reina, Vivienne S Jones, David R. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicTurtle Biology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGreat Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority
KeywordsHeronBiologyJuvenileSeasonalityTurtle (robot)ReefAnimal scienceEcologyFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study compared diving patterns of juvenile green turtles, Chelonia mydas, in a coral reef habitat during summer and winter. Dataloggers were deployed on green turtles at Heron Island, Australia, during December 2000 and August 2001 so that dive variables and ambient water temperature (T W ) could be monitored. Cloacal temperatures (T B ) were recorded from green turtles upon capture to assess their ability to maintain a thermal gradient between T B and T W . Data show that green turtles altered diving behaviour seasonally. Green turtles spent significantly more time in shallow water (<1 m) during winter than during summer. Dive depth for dives that exceeded 1 m was 2.9 ± 0.4 m (mean ± SEM) during summer and 4.4 ± 0.6 m during winter. Dive duration in summer (13.1 ± 1.2 min) was approximately half the dive duration in winter (24.3 ± 1.6 min), and surface interval in summer (0.6 ± 0.1 min) was one-third that of the surface interval in winter (1.8 ± 0.1 min). The observed changes in behaviour may be due to seasonal changes in environmental and physiological factors. There was no statistically significant difference between T B and T W during summer or winter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicTurtle Biology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207